It’s a Facebook Reel … doesn’t make it any less 😂🔗 funny
The LA Times ..
Legal scholars said the decision was expected — particularly as the 9th Circuit has moved from the country’s most liberal to one of its most “balanced” since the start of Trump’s first term.
‘#ConsiderTheSource
The Information reporting on the rape and spillage of an entire global industry …. and they barely bat an eye.
Waymo rides are 30% to 40% more expensive on average than Uber and Lyft on the same routes, according to a recent report by rideshare data analytics firm Obi. The firm analyzed more than 700 ride options across the three apps over the course of a month and found that Waymo’s prices averaged $18.06 per mile, higher than Uber and Lyft, which averaged $13.45 and $12.86, respectively.
What Happened.
- Taxis are expensive.
- We will flood the streets with cars and drivers who will do the same job and the market will decide the price.
- we will pay the drivers of this new fleet less money than existing taxi drivers to keep our costs down.
- new drivers will flock to this model - we will sell the jobs with new language - call it the gig economy - so people will have the feeling that they are in charge.
- This will result in the death of the global taxi business by using your (VC) money to undercut local business across the globe.
- With the taxi business dead, we can then introduce driverless cars.
- This will remove a significant cost of running the cars, since we won’t have to pay people.
- AND - rather than passing that saving on to customers, we will actually put the price of the ride up - back up to the original prices that the old taxis cost, but
1)‘medallion’ costs will have been removed.
2) people costs will have been removed.
3) competition will have been removed.
4) price of the cars in the fleet significantly reduced.
AND the profits from this venture will be consolidated back to our corporate headquarters.
Wow that sounds fantastic - how quick could you execute that plan (asks said VC)
oh - beginning to end? What 15 years?
VC it‘s 2025 - it took 16 years - why so long?
Oh we hit a few bumps in the road if you’ll pardon the pun .. we had to break a few laws, got thrown out of a few cities .. even countries and in the end get the laws changed to suit our business model. Without that we’d have cracked the whole thing in 11 or 12 - but the good news is that as we changed the laws, we worked out how not to pay any taxes and remove money out of circulation in every single country we operate in. So profitability is even higher than we predicted.
No - I’m pretty sure that I am not missing anything.
Law enforcement spoke with several members of Boelter’s family, including his wife, who was carrying passports and cash when police stopped her near a convenience store about 70 miles north of the shootings, an official said.
Coincidental I’m sure.
🎥 The Gorge, 2025 - ★★½

What was I thinking? I knew it wasn’t my kind of movie. And still I watched and … yeah. No.
The Gorge, 2025 - ★★½

What was I thinking? I knew it wasn’t my kind of movie. And still I watched and … yeah. No.
I think I am going to have to read 1975.
TÑump looks so happy ⦠in his sleep.
Tяump looks so happy … in his sleep.
🔗📹 a day of celebration … one of the better summaries of NoKings Day .. and on Facebook of all places.
Part Two Of The ‘Ages’ Series
The Age of Experience is rising even as the Age of Reason declines. Not to erase it, but to end its monopoly. Power is shifting from rigid logic and control to lived insight, emotional depth, and adaptive thinking, where success depends on how well you sense, respond, and connect. How then does Business adapt to survive?
The Age of Experience Is Emerging
Not yet subscribed? There’s a button for that.
Emerging? Not quite … an ‘age’ doesn’t just ‘show up’, rather, it emerges and grows ‘in the gaps between the boxes’. In context and in real-time. It’s not designed. It’s noticed. It’s responded to. To paraphrase Arthur Marwick;
‘The ‘60s started in 1958, and ended in 1974.
Good grief, if we can’t even agree on when a ‘decade’ starts and ends - there is surely no hope for dating an ‘era’! If you wish to read one piece on that topic, follow the link.
With apologies to Messrs Cleese and Chapman ..
The Age of Reason is no more! It has ceased to be! It's expired and gone to meet its maker! It's a late era, sir - a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! If you hadn't kept propping it up with artificial frameworks, it'd be pushing up the daisies! It's shuffled off its mortal metrics, run down the curtain, and joined the choir invisible. This… is an ex-era. And what you're clinging to isn't strategy - it's taxidermy.
[Actually, it’s not quite as bad as my parody suggests. I said ‘over’ - not 'dead’. There is a difference .. keep your eyes open for ‘part three’.]
So (now) what?
Welcome to the Age of Experience
Messier. More alive. Harder to pin down. Plans age in weeks. Teams move fast but struggle to move together with the result that;
Brilliant people are stuck in rigid systems.
Tired leaders are doing all the right things and then watching the wrong patterns repeat.
The problem isn’t effort. It’s mismatch.
We’re trying to play jazz from a marching band manual and if we know anything, it is that the ‘score’ is just one part of the performance. The end result is also impacted by the arranger, the performer, the audience, the interpretation, the understanding … I could go on, but anyone who has listened to even a good cover of their favorite piece of music knows what I am talking about.
If the Age of Reason was fixed tempo and perfect chords, then the Age of Experience is syncopated, unpredictable, improvisational. Coltrane, Mozart, Debussy… take your pick ...
“Music is the space between the notes."
And so it is with work. It happens between people, not inside the boxes someone drew in a ‘PowerPoint’. Work works despite the charts, the plans and the documentation.
You feel it when it’s working. The groove. The flow.
And you definitely feel it when it’s not.
Just one example that we can all relate to, let’s talk about ‘that’ document …
The Org’ Chart
Org charts are a fiction we cling to because they offer the comfort of imagined order (sanity in an insane world?). A made-up map of how things look, not how things work. Yet buried in all that pretense is their one honest function: to show who manages whom, and where people officially sit. It defines the pecking order. And, people have been trained to crave that structure. To measure worth by proximity to the top and how many lines dangle beneath their name.
Cynical? Maybe. But am I wrong? When was the last time your org chart helped you actually ‘GSD’? Because when it comes to the work people could do, these charts fall flat. They freeze living systems into tidy diagrams, pretending influence flows neatly from boss to subordinate. But power resides in odd corners, trust zigs sideways, and outcomes zag toward energy. ‘Titles’ need not apply.
And then it gets worse. Org charts ignore the shadow systems, the informal networks where work happens. They reward visibility over value, control over collaboration, and offer managers the false comfort that structure equals strategy. We know it doesn’t. We’ve known for decades. Peter Drucker …
“Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.”
That insight once meant something. But over time, it has been watered down. What started as a serious call to rethink management and leadership has turned into a parade of pithy aphorisms and motivational posters. The question of who really leads never landed because it wasn’t built into the system.
It’s no coincidence that in the last 25 years we have seen an increasing push to recognise and surface our leaders, in all walks of life. We have come to understand that leaders aren’t just the ones with titles. But in command-and-control structures, they’re still miscast. Leaders have become the human equivalent of water coolers. Everyone knows they’re there. That they are important. No one’s quite sure where they fit in - let alone ‘how’.
And why no coincidence? The shift from the ‘Age of Reason’ to the ‘Age of Experience’ isn’t overnight. The pieces have been moving for a while, it’s just that only now are we getting a picture and understanding of what that looks like. Leadership was a ‘first mover’. The ‘Age of Reason’ also had 'The Water Cooler'. There was something mystical ‘over there’. But just like ‘leadership’, organisations never quite understood what it was. They will.
In Summary .. the music of work flows between the boxes - in the quick chats, quiet nudges, improvised decisions, invisible leadership.
And when work breaks?
It’s not because people don’t care - it’s because the system wasn’t built for how people actually play.
That’s why I use ‘The Business Equation’.
They might not know it - but every organisation is already running on The Business Equation. And let’s be clear, it is not a rigid template. It’s a fluid framework that flexes, evolves AND gets broken and rebuilt. Constantly.
At its heart;
core resources - people, money, and ‘things’ - transformed through the
interplay of ‘process’ and ‘technology’
guided by human intent and action
into something others recognise as value - whatever form that may take.
If you think about it, that describes the core of any business. The unique aspects emerge because the nodes and connectors are;
never still
nor evenly weighted
rarely in sync
seldom aligned
Each humming to its own frequency, waiting to be tuned. And with no conductor, how do you do that, let alone maintain a rhythm? It becomes chaos. Familiar chaos - but chaos all the same.
Enter ‘stage left’ - Structured Thought.
What Structured Thought Is Not
A ‘rewrite’. It doesn’t impose a new composition, apply fresh rules, or drop in the 'method du jour' from your friendly 'neighbourhood' consultant (despite 'that one' being very effective at [X]… want to read the case study?)
Rather it listens to what’s already playing, and helps bring it into tune.
It takes that raw, human, improvisational energy already in motion and shapes it into a coherent flow that actually drives your business forward.
Because most of the time, it’s not the players that are the problem. Maybe the score is off, or maybe their role in the game doesn’t suit their strengths. Maybe the rules changed and no one told them. Or maybe - just maybe - they’re performing exactly as the system was designed to let them. And I do mean ‘let’.
The ‘Sound of Structured Thought’ is the 'Sound of Silence'.
Not a new methodology
Not a box-ticking exercise
Not a rigid tempo forced from ‘those at the top’, or worse - 'the consultants'.
It’s a practice. A way to bring coherence to complexity. To align your business not to a plan, but to its pulse.
And it is absolutely not about starting over. It’s about tuning what’s already there.
Thought without Structure? Noise.
Thought with Structure? Music.
So if you’re leading a group of brilliant players, but the tune’s not landing ...
OR
If every offsite, every 'OKR sprint', every new plan … ends up sounding like the last. If you can't recall whatever the latest TLA is - you know like 'OKR' ...
Don’t worry ... you’re not alone.
And if you have read this and are muttering under your breath ..
“We’ve tried everything. Why are we still stuck?”
Maybe it’s time to do something different and stop the blame.
If you want to talk more - I certainly do.
Let's set up some time to explore how Structured Thought can be used to help your business transition into the ‘Age of Experience’.
🎬 Wait … Foundation 3 is on the way? Haven’t even started Foundation 2
📸
ð¸ðµ Making the song reality.






