🔎

Recent Replies

Replying to: @jsonbecker

@jsonbecker oh yes - agreed - sending credentials is wrong and lazy. The worry is this idea of 100% ‘absolutism’ that is being assumed for internet verification that we don’t even pretend to have in real life. I would also like to see insistence on corporate identity - not oft talked about - but ID should go both ways - it can’t just be dear person please identify yourself to we the mighty corporation - I should be able to ask the caller to prove that they do indeed officially represent the company that they say they are from.

</stands_down_from_soapbox>

</end>

Replying to: json.blog

@jsonbecker you need to account for the who, not the what - age verification is about verifying the age of the person on the site, not the machines admin - AND ideally not just online.

Replying to: @bkryer

@bkryer 💯

Replying to: @manton

@manton BIG FAN.

Replying to: myles.garden

@myles 🤯 it took you 4 minutes? For the whole series? 😂😂😂

Replying to: @WiredDifferently

@WiredDifferently just finished episode 2 🤯

Replying to: john.philpin.com

I seem to have accidentally solved an earlier issue where replies out of Micro Blog were also rendering as WebMentions.

10 Minutes Later - WRONG. There’s that latency again. They are back. BUT - a challenge for another day.

Still left - a little bit of styling, template organising etc - but overall very happy.

I should also give a shout out to Claude who accompanied me on the journey - a first since the last time I tried Web-mentions Claude had not been born.

This time it continues to be both clear and true that the indie web is not for the ‘just make it easy’ community and is definitely part of the ‘committed community’.

For my dollars - as soon as we can solve that challenge - all the better.

Replying to: @philpin.com

@philpin.com 👁️

Replying to: devilgate.org

@devilgate Had to look him up. But - thank you❓

Replying to: john.philpin.com

I never knew how old he was. 60 is way too young.

Replying to: www.manton.org

@manton in certain circles .. that’s known as a ‘solid’ … 💯

Replying to: json.blog

@WiredDifferently it’s funny that this one surfaced in my feed yesterday which I saved for later - it does look good noting that it comes from 2022. How did I miss it?

Replying to: @fahrni

paging @dave who I’m sure will have an opinion ..

// @johnbrayton @manton @brentsimmons @fahrni

(#BeyondMyPaygrade … but observing how many cool readers have appeared this year .. that all seem to have a slightly different take)

Replying to: @bradenslen

@bradenslen I was just thinki⚡️💥

Replying to: ramblinggit.com

@bradenslen Real life corollary just from yesterday …

payment submitted, the thingy spins - get a message that it’s failed - check the card - the money has gone.

Wondering - is that a corollary?

Replying to: @artkavanagh

@artkavanagh now that IS a ‘longread’ :-)

Replying to: www.crucialtracks.org

@stefp i had never even heard of Broadcast until this post Stephen - so properly checked them out and love ’em - thank you.

Shades of Cocteau Twins / This Mortal Coil - though arguably ‘happier’. Maybe even a gentler kind of ‘Wondermints’. Just great stuff.

Replying to: john.philpin.com

It did not.