Recent Replies

Replying to: lmika.org

@lmika Estimate … +/- a lot - Depending on geogaphy of said café

Replying to: mitchwagner.com

@MitchWagner character naming is a lost art form. But in the Moore days - Bond lead the way in double entendre.

Replying to: mitchwagner.com

@MitchWagner This - This right here. THIS - T-H-I-S ….

THIS

I am keeping by my heart forever.

Replying to: @JohnPhilpin

Now up to 8.2 million.

Replying to: @plumey

@plumey URL please

Replying to: social.lol

@amerpie you should build on this more for better understanding please

Replying to: john.philpin.com

… on which topic not even ‘Reeder’ and ‘Reeder’ uses the same repository - so I guess there are reasons - but to my mind this doesn’t speak well to ‘Interop’ …

Replying to: @moonmehta

@moonmehta aah … only 2 per section .. now makes sense

Replying to: @davidmarsden

@davidmarsden it’s rather good.

Replying to: @JohnPhilpin

> “As I write, the video of Talarico’s interview has been viewed over 6 million times—more than twice the size of the Late Show’s nightly broadcast audience, and four times more than watched any part of his interview last year with Taylor Swift. So if Carr’s goal was to silence Talarico or chasten Colbert, it was an abject failure. According to Talarico, his campaign took in $2.5 million in contributions in the 24 hours after his interview was posted, and Colbert’s interview is still racking up viewers on his YouTube page, where criticism of the Trump administration seems to outperform other content by a factor of 10”

… over on Slate.