@iconfactory it is definitely not working for me as i would expect ⌠@manton - we never worked out what was going on with my account - couldnât signin with apple etc - and verify links getting lost. Eventually I moved on ⌠but this might be related? will dig out the correspondence and resend âŚ
I did manage to follow my json feed of my own account - but i donât see a use case for that?
@MitchW exactly and readwise is fine for a few select RSS feeds - but it overwhelms easily
@MitchW I use reeder for rss and am a readwise user of many years if that helps? Btw - classic reeder not the old one. I also very much like NNW.
@jsonbecker do you have sources where that is documented?
@iconfactory so even tho micro.blog is listed it doesnât work at the moment? It wonât even send me a verify code.
@WiredDifferently fun competition .. true or false for each claim.
Sharing them because Elmo is particularly pissed that his mini-Musks have been outed.
Elmo - you canât even begin to understand what that means. Maybe one day. But not yet.
@apoorplayer the trouble is that headlines these days often have no relevance to what is in the actual piece.
> âAn accurate definition of an internet âcreatorâ would have to be: someone whose income is determined by a platformâs algorithms.
seems not quite right âŚ
why not something like
an internet âcreatorâ would have to be someone whose income is sourced primarily through âharnessing the powerâ the internet.
and yes that might include say people who self publish on Amazon - but does not include people who publish through âlegacy publishersâ âŚ
and then it might not include (say) âThe Informationâ - but probably should include âBen Thompsonâ - so something about âindividualsâ not organisations âŚ
and then there is someone like even Daniel and Manton - should they be included?
PS
Not sure why it matters - maybe a separate discussion.