@jsonbecker nice idea .. but would hope it is a configurable setting
- Allow none .. accept occasionally
- Allow all … reject occasionally
// @manton
Replies
@JohnPhilpin Not from the same article - but you see what I mean ...
@pratik it could be me. I am going to explore more on mine - once I have worked it out.
@starrwulfe even 3.5 was helping me resolve code issues - like this and this
@pratik oh - and you won't be disappointed.
@pratik So you didn’t see that coming?
Separately - replying from the new reply on site feature. I tried to log on with Mastodon ... #FAIL
Then Related (my bold)
In a world increasingly saturated with mediocre artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content, the role of human curators who possess a distinct point of view and can guide the narrative of culture, politics or other topics will become increasingly important. These curators, who cannot be replaced by AI, provide a unique guiding function that people have always looked to individuals for. As AI models struggle with generating truly novel ideas, the value of influential individuals who curate content for others, combined with the support of powerful institutions that protect their integrity, will increase. Social platforms often enter a state of decay where users continuously create similar content, as the platforms optimize for distribution rather than originality, leading to boredom among users. However, the ability of human beings to consistently generate new ideas will remain a valuable asset that AI platforms cannot replicate.
From a podcast that I have yet to listen to - but this caught my attention - Ezra Klein and Nilay Patel.
@aaronpk thanks - i like step '0'
You are very brave, patient and understands that you have options (1) and (2)
saved for playing around with.
@danielpunkass just remove the three illegal ones - put there my a criminal.