๐ŸŽˆ165/366 ๐ŸŽต Memories Moving To The Future

A Musical Box - no, not ๐Ÿ”— ๐ŸŽต that one - though in itself well worth a watch - Gabriel at his theatrical finest in 1974.

I happened to drift around some music videos on YouTube last night - and well - some of them just needed to be shared โ€ฆ

Starting with a couple from Robert Plant with the Shape Shifters

๐Ÿ”— ๐ŸŽต 1 - Robert Plant at Austin City Limits

๐Ÿ”— ๐ŸŽต 2 - Robert Plant at Austin City Limits

And Then โ€ฆ

Moving on to why Music has a problem. 9 minutes from Rick Beato - listen.

๐Ÿ”— ๐ŸŽต Rick Beato on Music created by AI - All AI generated tracks come from ๐Ÿ”— Udio

Lets see how long it takes AI to do this โ€ฆ

All is not lost - except it might be because we have seen time and time again how the extraordinary is not always understood and often ignored.

๐Ÿ”— ๐ŸŽต Guthrie playing .. in The Hans Zimmer Show โ€ฆ just watch Zimmerโ€™s face during this 2 minute solo โ€ฆ

Who the hell is Guthrie (apart from the finest living exponent of the guitar you will ever hear.)

๐Ÿ”— ๐ŸŽต Rick spends 10 minutes answering that exact question


๐ŸŽˆ162/366 ๐ŸŽต๐Ÿ”— Ten New Albums I Am Enjoying Right Now - Ted Gioia

This is a track from one of them.

LOVE IT


๐Ÿ˜‚ I was rolling in the aisles when they first came out. They just reappeared today and I’m rolling in the aisles all over again. …

๐Ÿ”— ๐Ÿ“ผ How Does The Financial System Work

๐Ÿ”— ๐Ÿ“ผ How Banks Work


If you are reading this post on my site, the inline video gives an error. Click on the link above. The 'error' is only because the creator wants you to got to YouTube to watch it.

ย 


๐ŸŽˆ161/366 Ha .. kudos to Mr. @danielpunkass .. if it all goes wrong with MarsEdit, he clearly has a future with roles like โ€˜futuristโ€™ โ€˜Oracleโ€™ โ€˜punditโ€™ .. AI indeed.

Daniel is one of a handful of people that circulate in the Apple ecosphere that never forgets why Apple s different .. to (pretty much) any other company.

The extract from his post last year that @gruber called out is a perfect example.

๐Ÿ”— Gruber

๐Ÿ”— Bitspltting


Two must reads โ€ฆ that came through (to me at least) just this morning.

Enjoy.

๐Ÿ”— Crisis in the Culture: An Update - by Ted Gioia

๐Ÿ”—End of the Cloud Era - by Dana F. Blankenhorn


๐Ÿ“บ Turn Up Charlie

Just like ๐Ÿ–‡๏ธ Loot .. not one to dislike โ€ฆ and likely more a passion project for the only reason I watched it ( a while back now) .. Idris.

But I do like to occasionally log some older stuff .. cos we donโ€™t all watch everything at the time do we โ€ฆ so you still need to know.. right? Wrong?

Or do you?

Turn Up Charlie on ๐Ÿ”— Reelgood

โ€™Allโ€™ My TV Show Reviews

ย 

ShowNameBanner


๐Ÿ“บ Loot โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…ยฝ

There should be a rating between Like and Dislike. In the end I went for like .. because in all honesty I couldnโ€™t really โ€˜dislikeโ€™ โ€ฆ but no .. NOT a recommendation. I wonder if they were trying to go for that Ted Lasso feel good thing? No idea .. but whatever that Ted Lasso feel good thing is โ€ฆ it was not this.

LATER:

Get despite that initial review of the first couple of series … here I am again on the third. I guess it has something โ“

Series 1 โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…ยฝ

Series 2 โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…ยฝ

Series 3 โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…ยฝ

Loot on ๐Ÿ”— Reelgood

โ€™Allโ€™ My TV Show Reviews

ย 

Loot



Interesting Twist .. from todayโ€™s ๐Ÿ”— HCR

Then, on Saturday, there was what Danny Westneat of the Seattle Times called a plot twist. It turns out the state of Washington has a law on the books that prevents felons from running for office. But because a candidate has to be certified to be on a ballot before they can be challenged, the issue canโ€™t be resolved until Trump officially becomes the Republican Partyโ€™s presidential nominee at the July convention. Westneat asked, โ€œRepublicans: You sure you want to go down this road?โ€

Not entirely sure why this is different to Colorado off top of my head.



๐ŸŽˆ155/366 The First Vision Pro Concert Movie

I have touched on this before but after reading a Lefsetz post over the weekend, decided to expand a little and log the thinking for posterity.

๐Ÿ”— Lefsetz Letter - Company At The Sphere - that’s the link to where ๐Ÿ–‡๏ธ this quote came from that I published this weekend. I said I’d be back…

Around 2016 - ‘the term ‘spatial’ was being coined’. - though I personally think Apple’s ‘spatial’ is a light year or two ahead of where Mr. Scoble was at the time (He’s very quiet these days, isn’t he?)

๐Ÿ–‡๏ธ But February this year I made some pretty logical predictions about the first Vision Pro Movie.

๐Ÿ–‡๏ธ And in October last year I was predicting that The Sphere was a pretty good place to start on a โ€˜Vision Pro Concert Seriesโ€™ - and I think Apple will be the one to do it. Well, maybe not ‘doing’ it - but certainly financing it.

I still think that.

But who will be the director and/or subject matter for this groundbreaking event?

Who’s Out?

Despite Tay Tay’s global appeal, it won’t be her. The Swifties don’t have the money to buy the Pro.

Peter Jackson is deep into the latest tech to do great things, definitely a friend of Apple - and his foray into music with The Beatles is interesting - but no, no Sphere experience and besides ๐Ÿ”— he is deep into his next Trilogy .. as Producer - not Director, but still ..

Original “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy filmmaker Peter Jackson and his partners Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens are producing the movie and “will be involved every step of the way,” Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav said during an earnings call Thursday.

Phish? I dunno - not seeing it.

So Who’s In?

Two very real possibilities …

U2 - deeply intertwined with Apple - remember the album? And then they were first up at the Sphere - and Zane Lowe hanging out with them, talking with them. We have seen some of the footage, but who knows what was taken off the ‘back stage’ for the first Vision Pro movie?

… but I am wondering - and well out of left field - but …

The Grateful Dead - who have always been at the bleeding edge of touring and spectacle

  • The ‘Home’ band for Bay Area based Apple
  • Sphere residency happening - even as I type
  • Residency coincided with Earth Day 2024 (very โ€˜Appleyโ€™)
  • Lots of San Francisco through time imagery featured in the show
  • ๐Ÿ”— and then there is this - Huff Post - so maybe a pinch of salt is needed, written eight years ago โ€ฆbut written by Bill Bradey, so not his usual subject matter - but certainly no slouch.
  • Note that Mayer is also part of The Sphere residency.

Itโ€™s all fitting in for this bear.

The only hard thing to reconcile is that โ€˜Tay Tayโ€™ problem. Is there an overlap?

I think there just might be.

What do you think?


The post ๐Ÿ”— Slashes by Manu got me to thinking โ€ฆ

If

foo.com/contact

takes you to โ€˜contactโ€™ - but by using a โ€˜redirectโ€™ and the actual URL is more like

โ€˜stuff.weirdandcrazy.jcaourincag79q8i6iasicnAYT.comโ€™

โ€ฆ is it still a slash page?

Asking for a friend.



๐ŸŽˆ152/366 Politics - Again.

My reply to @ridwan got a little long, so I thought I might not reply and start a new thread.

๐Ÿ”— This is Ridwanโ€™s original post

This is my reply to his comment under that post โ€ฆ

We are in for a Labour government, which is a done deal. However, Is Keir Starmer’s the PM after 14 years of Tory squander? I see him as just another politician who will say anything to get elected and turn his back on the people who voted Labour. I guess, even if people do vote for Labour, how many really vote for Keir?

My Reply

Like all good British elections - very few people will get to vote for The PM .. ๐Ÿ˜€

The problem however is the same as ever it was - who the hell would want to get into politics anywhere these days - so you are left with those that do and when they do - you want to know what is wrong with them - and why - and …. I have a three thousand word introduction to the book about all of this - that I have in my head - but it will never reach paper or screen of any kind.


Here’s what I do know …

  1. Vote or Don’t Vote - BUT if you donโ€™t vote - you donโ€™t get to complain later.

  2. If you chose the first option - understand what principle(s) you are voting for - what problems you are wanting solved etc - and base your choice on the best of the candidates to do that. (There is no other choice.)

2.1) sometimes those calls are things like - ‘he’ll bring back school lunches - the other guy took them away

2.2) sometimes they are broader in nature - this candidate will ensure that billionaires pay the ‘same rate’ of tax as the rest of us, the other doesnโ€™t get it

2.3) sometimes the choice is that there is a clear and present danger to me, society, my country and the world … with the other - not so much.

ALL ARE VALID

.1 , .2 and .3 will vary by voter - sometimes on the day but more importantly - because of their general inability to

a - conceive of, b - understand, c - see the impact on themselves should it come that, d - concern themselves with others - so long as ‘I’ am ok e - just grok …

The possible outcomes of the wrong solution to ‘2.3’ and/or donโ€™t believe them.

So - if enough people at the 2.1 level voted for one person and enough people didnโ€™t vote for the ‘other’ person because they are too old, trips on stairs, mumbles .. guess who wins?


(Apologies a US biased set of criteria that is very real at the moment - but you get the drift - e.g. - back in Blighty - compared to David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris (the THREE Prime Ministers that served when Jeremy was the Leader of the Opposition for just 4 1/2 years .. how much worse off would we be?

I do know that JC was and is on the side of PEOPLE - and has served in Govt fighting the fight for over 40 years. When he was ousted - he didnโ€™t slink off like the last 4 Tory PMs did to reap their financial rewards, cashing in with the Corporations .. he’s still there , serving the people of Islington and still fighting the fight.

At a broad character level who would you rather have run the country for the past FOURTEEN YEARS? Seriously - FOURTEEN?

Heres the thing - the country is being ALLOWED to vote for a party that with one outcome would put Kier in charge. That’s not a bad thing … since Cameron - every single PM has actually been APPOINTED by a few people - it is a few in the Tory party ..

Cameron won in 2010 He won again (just) in 2015 - and I recall resigned over Brexit Theresa May was then appointed As the incumbent she then won the next election, but not very well, so was ousted and Boris moved in Who went on to win his election until Truss was appointed and then little Rishi.

Despite being in power for 14 years - Cameron was the last PM that actually won the election without first having a dry run as a PM because they had previously been appointed.

If Kier turns out to be no good - it is within the power of the Labour Party to remove him and put in someone else - it isn’t the first time - as the Tories continually demonstrate.


The UK isn’t the same as the US. Keep the prize in mind. 14 years of Tory Rule might be broken. Don’t not vote (for Labour) just because you think the leader is

just another politician who will say anything to get elected and turn his back on the people who voted Labour.

You vote for him to get Labour get in power. Donโ€™t like Labour? Vote Tory … clearly they know exactly what they are doing. Just look around the UK - it is clear.


If anybody doesn’t like all of this? Then it is time for action and to do something about it. Get others to join your cause. Change things. Too hard?

That’s why we are where we are.

PS - I know you all know all this. Sometimes I just have to wave my cane!


๐ŸŽˆ151/366 And The Word is โ€˜OMโ€™

๐Ÿ”— Mama - Mother Earth - Om โ€ฆ from Ted Gioia )

Great dive into โ€˜Mโ€™ โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ”—๐Ÿ“ผ But mostly this a short video demonstrating how a repeating rhythm increasingly speeded up just eventually โ€˜humsโ€™. Quite lovely.



Just updated my ๐Ÿ”— Using ‘page’ .. no longer just personal usage - now added business.


๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐Ÿ”— An oldy but goldy


If you are reading this post on my site, the inline video gives an error. Click on the link above. The 'error' is only because the creator wants you to got to YouTube to watch it.

ย 


๐Ÿ”— Darn

Q: Weโ€™ve been getting a lot of questions about an alleged Winston Churchill quotation and Iโ€™m trying to verify if itโ€™s genuine. The story is that when Churchill was asked to cut funding to the arts in order to support the war effort in World War II, he responded โ€œThen what would we be fighting for?โ€ Have you ever seen this quote? Iโ€™ve seen a lot of sources saying that itโ€™s fake but I would love to get your opinion.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Dan Evon, Snopes.com

The quote came to mind about 80% through Ken Burns Brandeis address.

[๐Ÿ”— ๐Ÿ“ผ You can watch it here.](Ken Burns, Hโ€™24 Keynote Address to Brandeis University’s 2024 Graduates)