From Visuals To Vision

Tracing the evolution from visual thinking frameworks like Group Partners’ 4D to Structured Visual Thinking (SVT) and beyond, this newsletter reveals how visuals became powerful tools for clarifying strategy, aligning teams, and driving execution and why rigid models and rare skills limited their impact. The article highlights why ‘Structured Thought’ is the next step: taking the clarity of visuals and coupling it with principles that make strategy adaptable, scalable, and actionable for any organisation.

Read The Full Article

If you want to talk more - I certainly do.

Let's set up some time to explore how Structured Thought can be used to help your business transition into the ‘Age of Experience’.

https://cal.com/jphilpin/60


A Brief History of Visual Thinking

Visual thinking has shaped strategy work for decades, from Arnheim’s 1960s theories to the whiteboard sketchers and infographic craze. But without structure, it too often drifts into decoration instead of decision. This piece traces that history and sets up why I developed Structured Thought - a way to turn visuals from creative flourishes into business advantage.

Read The Full Article

If you want to talk more - I certainly do.

Let's set up some time to explore how Structured Thought can be used to help your business transition into the ‘Age of Experience’.

https://cal.com/jphilpin/60


🎵 Paul Simon wrote The Sound of Silence nearly 60 years ago. Not as a hymn to peace, more a warning - about noise drowning out meaning. Yet here we are in 2025, trapped in the Noise Economy: dashboards buzzing, leaders performing, everyone talking, no one listening.

🔗 Read More


The Sound Of Silence ...

Human By Design is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

In a prior newsletter, I referenced an upcoming third part of the two part series - this isn't it. This is part two of the second part. Confused? You won’t will be.

Paul Simon’s ’The Sound of Silence’ is not a hymn to peace, it’s a warning.

(Paul Simon? Sorry - another ‘dated cultural reference’ - the guy that wrote this song ..

... the original …

Next year is its 60th birthday.)

A warning about the cost of disconnection and a society that confuses noise with meaning. When

“people talk without speaking and ‘hear’ without listening”

it creates a world where insight is drowned in volume, and truth is pushed to the margins …

“graffitied on subway walls while the neon gods glow above”.

Written in 1966. Welcome to 2025 and the noise - both cultural and corporate. It’s in our dashboards, our strategy decks, our KPIs, our Slack channels. And we’ve learned to perform in it. Constantly communicating, never quite connecting.

Talking at volume, rarely at depth.

Leave a comment

We confuse motion with clarity. Performance with alignment. We pile on data, frameworks, and meetings, hoping that somewhere in the noise, the signal will emerge. It doesn’t. It is so bad that the phrase ‘signal to noise ratio’ is in common parlance. (I just wish those same people had heard of ‘The Shannon Hartley Theorem’)

The signal can't be heard because it’s drowned out by the cacophony of everyone having an opinion and expressing it. Loudly.

Off the top of my head we are currently sitting atop of 14 ‘Economies’. The;

  1. Knowledge Economy

  2. Digital Economy

  3. Experience Economy

  4. Attention Economy

  5. Creator Economy

  6. Gig Economy

  7. Sharing Economy

  8. Platform Economy

  9. Surveillance Economy

  10. Token Economy

  11. Circular Economy

  12. Green Economy

  13. Purpose Economy

  14. Emotion Economy

Sorry - 15. Welcome to The ‘Noise Economy’. Where visibility is currency, volume is mistaken for value, and the loudest voice wins. The problem? We’ve lost track of which economy we’re actually in (see above), but the Noise Economy is most definitely a direct descendant of ..

  • The Attention Economy, fuelled by clicks, likes, and scrolls, we were trained to compete on distraction, not depth.
    Capturing eyeballs matters more than holding minds.

  • The Information Economy, more knowledge, more tools, more power.
    It didn’t teach us how to think. Just how to hoard.

  • The Intention Economy, tried to shift power to the user by asking ‘what the customer wants’.
    Most organisations still don’t listen so it remains guess work at best.

Share

The Noise Economy

It’s what happens when attention, information, and intention all get misused. When systems built for focus get hijacked by the need to be seen. When every meeting needs filling, every dashboard animating, every ‘strategy’ deck starting at 50 slides.

Everyone’s broadcasting. No one is listening.

Responsiveness is confused with responsibility. Activity mistaken for progress. Motion for clarity.

And behind it all, the only economy that really matters - the Impact Economy (an economy that didn’t even make it on to my list of 15 - that is how bad it is.) - suffers. Because impact requires intention, filtered through structure, made real through action. And action needs clarity, not clutter.

Structured Thought reclaims that. Cuts through the static. Connects the real economies. And says: 🛑 stop performing. Start thinking.

Leadership in the Noise Economy

This obsession with noise distorts how we see leadership too.

We idolise the fixers. The ones who swoop in when something breaks. They get the spotlight. The headlines. The promotion. But we rarely ask: Why did it break? Who let the system bend until it snapped? And who held it together - quietly - before it failed? By the way - I am by no means the first person to write about this issue - there’s Martin Gutmann for example …

In today’s organisations, silence from a leader is suspicious. If you’re not seen, are you leading? If your team runs so smoothly that nothing flares up, does anyone notice? If the crisis never comes because you designed things right - do you get credit?

This is how we end up with leaders who perform leadership instead of practising it. They talk first in meetings. Reframe failure as their win. Build narratives faster than they build systems.

Structured leadership is different. It’s quieter. More design, less drama. It’s about preventing the problem before it arrives. About removing friction so people can do great work - without needing a hero to rescue them from chaos.

No standing ovation. Just sustained results.

Structured Thought as Anti-Performance

Structured Thought doesn’t announce itself. No fanfare. No flourish.

It starts with a pause. A silence. A moment when someone chooses to see before reacting.

It’s the discipline to filter before speaking. The skill to simplify without dumbing down. The courage to name what’s really going on - not what looks good in a quarterly update.

It’s anti-performance in the best sense. It replaces spin with structure. Buzzwords with logic. Consensus noise with clear direction.

That makes it quietly dangerous. In systems hooked on visibility, structure looks like subversion. But it’s what actually holds.

Silence as a Design Principle

In music, the ‘rest’ is as important as the note. Quoting myself, paraphrasing great musicians;

“Music is the space between the notes."

In architecture, it’s the space - not the walls - that makes a room useful.

In leadership, silence is where credibility is earned.

Structured Thought treats silence not as absence, but presence. It’s not what’s missing - it’s what makes meaning possible.

Good leaders don’t fill every silence. They shape it. They wait - not because they don’t know what to say, but because they’re paying attention. They let the signal surface. Let the system speak.

That’s not hesitation. That’s design.

Where Insight Hides

When Simon wrote,

“the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls,”

he wasn’t being poetic. He was being precise.

Real insight rarely shows up where you expect. It’s not in the pre-read or the polished deck. It’s in the offhand comment. The silent tension. The space between what’s said and what’s done.

The prophet isn’t always the keynote. Sometimes it’s the intern. The operator. The one who sees the system clearly - because they’re in it.

Structured Thought knows where to look. It doesn’t chase headlines. It watches the quiet parts of the system. Listens between the lines. And when it finds something real, it doesn’t amplify - it clarifies.

When Silence Speaks … Structured Thought Begins

When the noise stops. When the talking pauses. When someone finally asks, “What are we really doing here?” - and waits for the real answer.

Silence, in this sense, isn’t passive. It’s surgical. It clears space for structure to emerge. For ideas to breathe. For strategy to mean something again.

Because when the thinking is clear, there’s no need to shout.

No need to decorate or defend.

Just let the silence do its work.

That’s what makes it powerful.

The sound of Structured Thought is the sound of silence.

The sound that comes when something finally makes sense.

Thank you for reading Human By Design! Please don’t keep it to yourself - share it. Everywhere.

Share

If you want to talk more - I certainly do.

Let's set up some time to explore how Structured Thought can be used to help your business transition into the ‘Age of Experience’.

https://cal.com/jphilpin/60

Human By Design is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


So many jokes running through my body this morning - stopping at my knuckles and throat so they aren’t seeing the light of day.




Back in the day ‘we’ had a line:

“Oracle’s first platform for any `Product’ is always PowerPoint - and is written by LJE.”

It stemmed from Larry’s penchant for announcing products in large public forums and nobody else seemed to have any knowledge of it.

Just read this:

🔗 The New Math of Quantum Cryptography

With this quote

Some Oracles never change. readwise.io/reader/sh…


Back in the day ‘we’ had a line:

Oracle’s first platform for any `Product’ is always PowerPoint - and is written by LJE.

It stemmed from Larry’s penchant for announcing products in large public forums and nobody else seemed to have any knowledge of it.

Just read this:

🔗 The New Math of Quantum Cryptography

With this quote

Oracles can be useful theoretical tools, but they don’t actually exist.

Some Oracles never change.


Haven’t done one of these in a while - but have to say i started it - and it just flowed out - so publish and be dammed is what I say.

🖇️ Marketing in 2025


Marketing in 2025

Human By Design is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

My last two newsletters consolidated a recurring theme running through my thinking and writing over the past couple of years. In case you missed them …

To which a few of you have commented ( I paraphrase)

“Very good John - so what? How does all of that translate into practical advice?

This is one of my many responses - because it’s not just about marketing - but its not a bad place to start …

In the age of mass production, mass media, and mass markets, a period I call ‘The Age of Reason’ - marketers leaned heavily on McCarthy’s ‘4Ps’; product, place, price, and promotion. If you’ve studied marketing, you’ve seen them. McCarthy first wrote about them in 1960 - sixty-five years ago, the same year DEC released the PDP-1, ‘mini-computer’ that eventually gave way to the PDP-11 in the 1990s.

Behold - A PDP 1 - image courtesy of Wikipedia

The new mini computers were used in many different ways, but in commerce, those early systems had one job: record-keeping. They grew into ERP and accounting platforms and became the backbone of business IT - what we now call ‘Systems of Record’.

Back then - and still too often today - business obsessed over control and management. Success was counted in widgets: how many, how fast, where they were. Forecasting became the holy grail, feeding our endless urge to control our world. That mindset married perfectly with systems of record: tallying, tracking, predicting. Life was great and predictable - and good. And then it wasn’t.

Because in a world where corporate assets are reduced to ‘money’, ‘things’, and ‘people’ - and the first two already had solid systems to manage them, well - it was ‘obvious’ that the third ‘asset class’ should fold into the same approach. Right

Enter HRIS, then SFA, and soon CRM. The common denominator? People. And I’d argue this: If those systems were seen to work for the organisation that implemented them, then that organisation was under some very mistaken impressions and were likely;

  • measuring the wrong thing

  • mistaking compliance for performance

  • confusing activity with impact

  • confusing control with capability

  • counting what’s easy - not what matters

  • rewarding box-ticking - not real results

or worse - all of the above.

Leave a comment

Put bluntly: these systems thrived because they gave management what they wanted (numbers, reports, predictability), not what people needed (clarity, connection, purpose).

It gets even worse.

As soon as they could (that would be in the 1970s), organisations turned computer power toward ‘marketing at scale’. And ‘we the people’ got the fallout: catalogues, direct mail, loyalty schemes. Primitive by today’s standards, but driven by the same intent - reduce people to records to be targeted, segmented, and pushed. The 4Ps, AIDA, and other ‘proven’ formulas supplied the scaffolding the machines were coded to obey.

It rolled on through generation after generation of so-called people systems, first SFA then CRM, then HRIS - because if you can reduce customers to records to manage - why not staff too?1

And it has never got better. Easier? Yes. More flexible? Absolutely. But better for ‘we the people’? Not at all. It’s so bad that you can still find people writing about the customer journey as if it were linear, predictable, and controllable - when every lived experience screams the opposite.

Which brings me to this transition we are moving through.

The 4Ps were born in a world obsessed with control, scale, and efficiency. Businesses looked inward, measuring inventory, transactions, and compliance. Customers were barely in the frame (thought to be fair - the 4Ps were extended to the 7Ps in the early 80s - and today they’ve stretched to 10. More levers, same broken system.

Fast forward to 2025, and I think we can all agree that the mindset is obsolete. We no longer live in the Age of Reason - we live in the Age of Experience and such transcendence begs for a new model. A model that works in the Age of Experience.

Introducing The 4Es

Engagement Marketing is now in charge.

In 2025 we live in the Age of Experience. The old 4P framing hasn’t held for years and today is irrelevant. Today we look through the lens of

  • solutions, not products

  • value, not price

  • convenience, not place;

  • education and dialogue, not promotion

… because Customers aren’t passive - they are active participants shaping the exchange.

Share

Essence

Who you are and why you matter.

Your purpose, values, and the human problem you exist to solve.

People buy the why, before they buy the what.

Exchange

The mutual value created.

Customers give more than money, they trade time, trust, data, and attention. In return they expect outcomes, solutions, and belonging.

Marketing is a relationship, not a transaction.

Ease

Frictionless access.

How simple is it to find you, use you, trust you, leave you, or return?

In systems of engagement, convenience equals commitment.

Experience

The lived reality of the relationship.

Every touchpoint markets who you are: a help desk call, an onboarding email, an invoice.

If your marketing still runs on levers built in the 1960s, it’s time to move.
The 4Es aren’t theory, they’re survival.

I’ll get to the ‘sales funnel’, the flywheel and how all this connects with all that next time. Until then - to borrow from Geoffrey Moore;

That’s What I Think - What Do You Think?

Subscribe now

If you want to talk more - I certainly do.

Let's set up some time to explore how Structured Thought can be used to help your business transition into the ‘Age of Experience’.

https://cal.com/jphilpin/60

1

I know I made this point a few paragraphs before this, but it’s worth repeating because some points deserve to be hammered in, not just noted - and this point is so important that it will be built on in a future article.


Apparently 4 in 10 people in the US approve of Trump’s economic performance - there must be a lot more billionaires in the U.S.A. than I thought.


When a tennis match starts does one write that it was due to ‘kick off’ at 2-30?


Trust the Supreme Court says Amy to Bari .. it’s all going to be ok.

For who?


Atlassian purchasing The Browser Company definitely puts it into a more specific space .. it’s clearly no longer ‘for us all’.

On the other hand it might become the sole product out of the Atlassian stable that I regularly use.


📸 Not wrong


📸 Not wrong


🔗🎵 Guthrie 1

🔗🎵 Guthrie 2

🔗🎵 Guthrie 3

.. .Govan in case you need to know before watching a master in action.


N case you are wondering .. no, I’m not wondering.