@manton one immediate thought

‘Sources’ is doing heavy lifting.

To borrow from Dave’s analogy - if we are talking ‘a river’ - the source is where it starts - not where it ends up - so two pages OR two sections

sources - all the services supported that are out there - and we get to add whatever the links are

these are placed like an RSS feed or a word press blog of Lettrboxd or Sourcefeed or whatever

don’t need to list them all - but you could provide examples of which people might like to pull on

THEN - ‘destination’ - same deal - eg

Bluesky, Masto, LinkedIN et at

not exactly a finished work of art - but you’ll get the picture - and pardon the pun …

The dotted arrows might be what is possible but not connected - the solids are connected and working - green if working properly - red is connected but not working. I know I know - stretching the scope … and yes i recognise some nuances around this - different services pull and push in different ways

Some are names. others just feeds - but for me - allowing me to name the fee would be useful - particularly with something like AlbumWhale - where I pull a couple of different feeds in - BUT - that list COULD be 15 different ones ..

also yes - it might be that some services are featured on both sides - and that is ok

as a blogger - my thinking is not bluesky, masto, rss etc - it is where do i want to pull in from - and then what do I want to push out to.