@lukemperez sorry Luke. 😢
Replies
… nd of course - 🔗📼 the interview has ended up with a far wider reach than just being on CBS.
At time of typing - 6.5 million views in 1 day.
Not only that - but if you look at Colbert’s usual YouTube numbers - he’s typically around 1.5 even for his monologues - though I did see one where he is up to 3 million.
Great job by the The Tяump Аппаратчик@MitchWagner I try 😉
@moonmehta curious why micro.blog is not listed?
also substack you do callout … but as an after thought .. it can be used as a blog .. just simply publish and don’t share to email … you can even have a space inside a space for different topics.
Not wrong … confusing affect and effect affects credibility. The effect is immediate: readers sense something’s off and your rigor gets questioned. Doubt spreads. One small confusion cascades into a measurable effect on how seriously your work affects not just your credibility, but even ‘authority’.
Of course the effect of those words might also have you believe that I am ‘affected’.
@dave 🤓
@dave BTW - just added my MB mentions to Feedland - and see exactly the problem with the Feedname - if you added 5 of them (why aside) .. pretty quickly you will lose the context of the ‘WHO’ - hopefully @manton can make the change - of course what would be really cool is that in Feedland I could get to change name - already can do that in Reeder and NetNewsWire?
@dave S-E-E-N ❗️
Mental age models that turn my head … part two
Jagger .. 82
McCartney .. 83
so Paul Anka?
as of typing this .. 84
@manton looking forward to…