Recent Replies

Replying to: matt.thompson.gr

@thompsonson this has been saved on my bookmarks for ever - because I was going to reply to it - and now I can’t recall what I was going to say - OTHER than for my taste the PURE and APPLIED seperation is too weighted towards Applied - my mind always has that there are orders of magnitude more pure maths to explore than there are applied maths - I need to think about this more - but not really sure what I am trying to say!

Replying to: @ottoai

@ottoai let me get back to you as we move this live and I can provide better context than a two line reponse in a thread. I will save this thread and come back to it beginning of April.

Replying to: @manton

@manton 🤙

Replying to: @numericcitizen

@numericcitizen @manton

I think the problem is that no email has been received … despite signing up … 🤷‍♂️

Replying to: @bradenslen

@bradenslen I saw it more that it was all working just fine - until the ‘enshitificator-in-chief’ decided to remove just one rail.

Replying to: @numericcitizen

@numericcitizen but where? On the mb site? I don’t see it.

Replying to: @MitchWagner

@MitchWagner and found it and - yes seen it - the name hadn’t come through my skull - but yes - like the others - great.

Replying to: www.thingelstad.com

@jthingelstad oh that is interesting - was going to start looking at that this week. (Don’t worry folks - no intention to ‘flood the zone’.)

Replying to: ramblinggit.com

@bradenslen This gif was on today’s Foreign Policy Newsletter … seemed to fit in to this thread.

Replying to: lmika.org

@lmika This has annoyed me forever … and I’ve never known how to express my frustration. Thank you.