Recent Replies

Replying to: www.washingtonpost.com

@dave that’s ok - he’s assumed major domo status for global terrorism

Replying to: json.blog

@jsonbecker been requested many times -

// @danielpunkass

Replying to: www.joelhamill.com

@joelhamill Israel doesn’t bomb the US?

Replying to: json.blog

@jsonbecker fuck the fucker

Replying to: @danielpunkass

@danielpunkass people live in their bubbles

@tchambers is BlueSky decentralized? I know they have designed it to be .. but where is the second instance today?

Replying to: combatdavey.micro.blog

@combatdavey consider the source

Replying to: @devilgate

@devilgate well yes - not totally destroyed

Replying to: mastodon.social

@waynedixon that’s what I saw in the keynote thingy

Replying to: @bjhess

@bjhess confusion will reign

Replying to: @writingslowly
Replying to: bucky.micro.blog

@bucky the headline says ‘might’ and I have no idea what it actually says since I don’t send them money.

Replying to: duran.micro.blog

@duran then you shouldn’t

Replying to: hawaiiboy.micro.blog

@hawaiiboy that hard to believe .. and sad.

LATER .. though looking around it seems that many of the officials from all States didn’t .. including Gavin in CA.

Replying to: blog.ningnarrative.com

@ningkantida the clue was in the first two thirds of the title - with the final third being the clincher.

Replying to: @manton

@manton certainly be better than today .. thank you

Replying to: manton.org

@manton late to this particular party - as part of the discover clean up - could we also create a way to separate mb users from ;the others’ in profiles. When you see someone with 250 followers that you don’t follow - but you ONLY want to follow MB users - you are forced to scroll through 250 records that are mostly NOT MB .. simply pushing MB users to the top would solve that as a first pass. Have raised this many times before - and generally it seems to be edge case john again - but I think would help the whole process for all.

Replying to: john.philpin.com

My apologies - I got it wrong .. (my bold)

University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers wrote: “The US & Chinese trade negotiators have negotiated a handshake agreement to seek signoff to agree that a previously-agreed agreement was still their agreed upon agreement. (That agreement is not an agreement but a framework for seeking future agreements).” He added: “Notice that not only are we not getting a better deal, we’re not even getting back to where we were at the start of the Administration.

Replying to: john.philpin.com

@philpin.com I had not