đď¸ LongForm
Want to reduce the noice and just focus on things with a little more meat - the this category is for you. Like so much on this site we have a ‘WIP’ as i take some out - and put some in - but safe for at least starting in 2026.
People: Sarah
She was alone at the bar … a glass of water, a giant pile of French fries and a separate bowl of potato chips sat in front of her. The seats on either side of her were empty at an otherwise full bar.
âNoâ she said. âNobody is sitting thereâ
I took a seat, introduced myself and she said her name was Sarah. I ordered a beverage.
People: John and Mary
They were from Massachusetts. This was the start of their fourth month on the road - thousands of miles away from their home.
Mary was stood watching John who was lying on his back under the car.
People: Gina
Gina told me that her husband was a magician. A very good magician.
Turns out that he is also a maths teacher. That’s how he makes is money. He really wants to make his living as a magician. Magic is is his passion.
People: Dan
Dan knew what he was doing. He offered me an Amber Ale from his selection. It was glorious. Arguably one of the best Amber’s I had ever tasted.
People: Candy
I met Candy while she was having dinner with her beau ... Brian. She is a truck driver who operates as far North as Seattle and as far South as San Jose.
People:â Caroline and Marcus
Caroline and Marcus had arrived in the US a couple of days earlier, most of their two-week sojourn in front of them.
People: Stevie
Stevie was unsteady on his feet. He walked slowly. He didnât seem to have much money. He was visiting the area because he had a hospital appointment.
People: Jeff and Emma
Jeff had worked in Somerset for 4 years. Emma's mother was born in England. Now they lived in America. Together.
A People First Update
People First has a big vision and is moving forward on a variety of initiatives. Life is too short to record it all in detail here ... so I am choosing to reference a few (in alphabetical order);
- (The) Business Of Identity
- CH-MRC
- Digital Puerto Rico
- IndieWeb
- Internet Identity Workshop
- Lost Identity
Some are large far-reaching initiatives some are small ideas. Some I am just interested in, others I am helping get established. I believe all are designed to help 'move the can down the road' in different ways. (The can being that which we each need to move forward to create a better world where people and their humanity are not afterthoughts but at the center of thinking, decisions and action.
And that human-centered perspective got me to thinking about people - and their stories.
So, in parallel with these initiatives, we are also pivoting the site, including moving the blog front and center and dropping the 'WhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow' pages to a supporting role on the site.

We are also announcing the introduction of a new theme of posts categorized as 'Travels Without Charley' -Â tipping cap, doffing hat, nodding head vigorously towards one John Steinbeck.
The power of the blog, even if it is on Medium
Itâs a piece by SF mayoral candidate Jane Kim ⌠calling the SF Chronicle out on their attempted hatchet job.
One of her questions back:
âWhy didnât you fact check the false assertions contained in these questions against publicly available information before contacting me or choosing to move forward with this story?â
Which resulted in them not runing with the story at all …. this is their response
The irony is palpable
Politico reporting how Seattle, San Francisco et al are too expensive to live in because highly paid tech people are arriving and pushing up the prices.
Those same tech people are very quick to preach that the Future of Work is virtual.
Is it that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander?
The Echo Chamber
Great read - and spot on …
“And this leads to my second reaction, which is the deepest impatience and frustration with IndieWeb itself for having developed tools to very literally revolutionize the web, but then continuing to not strive for a level of public visibility beyond that of model-train enthusiasts, perhaps, or ham-radio clubs. Smart, motivated people gathering regularly in the shared pleasure of their craft, with these quiet gatherings having negligible effect on the world at large.
I really want to work out how to elevate the conversation and get to a wider audience …. the challenge I think is that we donât have sufficient weight / experience of people in the community that understand how to Cross The Chasm.
Cambridge Analytica
As I said … they will be back ….
âIn recent months, executives at Cambridge Analytica and SCL Group, along with the Mercer family, have moved to created a new firm, Emerdata, based in Britain, according to British records. The new companyâs directors include Johnson Ko Chun Shun, a Hong Kong financier and business partner of Erik Prince. Mr. Prince founded the private security firm Blackwater, which was renamed Xe Services after Blackwater contractors were convicted of killing Iraqi civilians.â
Just didnât quite expect them to include Blackwater this time round.
About Flickr and SmugMug
My bold ….
We think you are going to love Flickr under SmugMug ownership, but you can choose to not have your Flickr account and data transferred to SmugMug until May 25, 2018. If you want to keep your Flickr account and data from being transferred, you must go to your Flickr account to download the photos and videos you want to keep, then delete your account from your Account Settings by May 25, 2018.
This reads that all Flickr moves to SmugMug - and if it doesnât your Flickr account will be deleted.
To my knowledge there is not a free SmugMug.
So is that going to be introduced after May 25th? Or will we all then be paying?
Why You Should Not Delete Facebook
Again not me .. but …
I’m specifically not deleting my account because:
- I intend to exercise a number of my data subject rights, and complain if Facebook does not respond appropriately.
- I’m expecting the alternatives to Facebook to improve (because they’re virtually non-existent now), and will look forward to using data portability.
Siri - Drafts Experiment
The following is an experiment using Siri to talk to Drafts which I will then publish to microblog. The idea works by use of special code inside of Drafts that allows you to talk to your device and it in turn happily translates that into text. The cool thing is that normally with Siri there is a time cut off. With Drafts you can keep on talking talking talking while it types and types and types. What it doesn’t seem to do is improve the ability of Siri to understand what you’re saying.
One step at a time.
What Can Possibly Go Wrong?
The premise is simple: instead of owning your own bike, you can find and rent a JUMP bike directly in their app â each one has a built-in GPS. Bikes are scattered across the city, locked to racks, poles, or even trees.
An example of went wrong in China is below - and that doesnât include bikes tied against trees, lamp posts and stop signs that will be all over San Francisco.
Thank-you dear tax payer - we will repurpose these âutilitiesâ, make your city look like crap, probably cause accidents because we wonât be too careful about where we leave stuff …. oh and we are not responsible … you see we simply âfacilitate bike sharingâ.
Healthcare Is not the same as Healthcare Insurance
The headline,
Josh Kushnerâs healthcare start up
caught my eye, so I read on.
Oscar, the health insurance startup co-founded by Joshua Kushner and Mario Schlosser, has raised $165 million in new venture capital funding. A source puts the post-money valuation at $3.2 billion, which is up from $2.7 billion in early 2016.
Oh … not healthcare start up at all … health Insurance startup. I do find the conflation of these two very different businesses in the US not just confusing - but almost deliberately misleading.
…. and yes, Josh is the Kushner that you donât read too much about.
Exploitation Of People By People

Vehicle Costs May Put Some Uber and Lyft Drivers in the Red
âThe ride-sharing drivers earn just $3.37 per hour on average, according to an MIT study. I have said for a long time that the same people who object to treatment of workers in remote countries making phones, garments et al ... are generally the self same people who love the convenience of âtheirâ Uber. Case In Point ... disasters. We seem to worry more about issues that are close to home far more than remote ones ... 2 dead in storm floods in the next state over is so much more worrying than 200 dead in Pakistan floods ... yet exploitation of those people in Pakistan by the garment industry hits the news cycle regularly ... exploitation of our own countrymen in the so called âsharing economyâ ... that we donât hear about too much at all.
Meat - Meet Meat
This is a great read … essentially talking about the many different initiatives around the globe working on creating meat to eat, independent of animal.
Then there is this where The US Cattlemenâs Association are essentially proposing that
FSIS exclude from the statutory definitions of âmeatâ and âbeefâ those products that are not âderived from animals born, raised, and harvested in the traditional manner.â
Personally, I am with the Cattlemen - we should be clear about where our food comes from … count me in on the side of ‘clear GMO labelling’ for example. But then I am also on the side of those Cattlemen being clear about where their animals come from … how they are treated … etc etc but they do tend to fight that - because really they are also against this kind of publicity:


But that all said - I am also interested in defining terms. Is meat something that is defined by process …. i.e. all meat comes from an animal or content / structure …. i.e. all meat is meat if it cannot be distinguished by scientific analysis.
I also full expect âbrand' to enter the debate … after-all - I can make âChampagneâ anywhere in the world - and you will not be able to chemically or structurally separate it from Champagne made in Champagne - but of course we all know that only Champagne made in Champagne can actually be called Champagne. In other words - there is a prior case in the food world that process does NOT define what you can call something - only the source defines it. ON that basis - the Cattlemen might win.