đ¤ PeopleFirst
đ The AI Conversation CEOs Are Not Having Out Loud.
The topic was AI. But the real conversation was leadership.
đŹ Brian Solis
The myth that CEOs ‘know’ is exactly that.
The bad ones play into that myth.
The good ones build trusted teams around them.
Same can be said for Presidents.
The Rear View Mirror
The same can be said for Systems of Record.
This is the first of a two part issue. If you already know our history and are more interested in where we are going - then the next newsletter is for you.
âTheyâ have their CRM. Whereâs my VRM?1
Before you get too excited - sorry this is not about that - but - the question has been my North Star for a couple of decades. Itâs the itch that âSystems of Recordâ couldnât scratch, and the reason I spent my career working as a translator in rooms where the wrong problems were being solved with clinical precision.

The Translator in the Room.
My job was simple ..
Translate.
For technologists - competing to build smarter mousetraps and needing to explain themselves to âthe marketâ.
For people - realising that the real problem isn't catching mice, it's that nobody's talking about why the mice are there in the first place.
I lived in that gap. I learned to speak both languages and discovered that software companies are brilliant at âsolving the wrong problem really wellâ.2
It was a sign of the times - but they optimised for efficiency. For capture. For storage. For control. Systems of Record, designed to document what happened yesterday so they could save money today. And they locked you in. Built moats around the data. Made you dependent. Thatâs where the money was - still is for some. And at the time that was the right thing to do.
But to remix a couple of metaphors - if all you have is a hammer, by the time you get to where the puck is going, the problem might not be a nail anymore.
Tomorrow's problems canât be solved with yesterday's tools.
I also learned that you can only save up to 100% of what you have BUT on the flip side - The Business Equation makes clear that there are no such limits to growth.
These learnings contributed to the foundation of âJohn2.0â - People First. Process Second. Technology Third. And by âpeopleâ I mean all people - customers, staff, vendors, partners, members ⌠and knowing what each person needs to âimprove their lotâ - not what the system wants to capture and a series of âtruthsâ informed how to build these new systems.
When I left People First âbehindâ to start PHIâPIN3, it was only the name that changed. The foundation, the thinking, the frameworks all remained and are in constant use and now we build solutions on those principles. Not with a new tech stack. No reinvention of the wheel. Definitely not throwing away what works and absolutely building value through a three step process.
Think carefully.
Build whatâs needed now.
Stay agile for the future.
Websites appear as outcomes not as the project. Solutions emerge from solving real problems, not from feature roadmaps. We move fast, faster than most. But every piece serves a purpose. Nothing exists for its own sake.
And hereâs the thing:
We make money when our customers grow, not when theyâre stuck.
The sunset in the rear view is clear. Yesterday is over and tomorrow is a new day.
Will it be exactly the same as yesterday? No. So why are you doing the same thing?
Each of us has one history - and many possible futures.
Which future is all to do with the choices you make today.
Want to talk more?
Joyce Searls (yes - that Joyce) posed this question years ago in the early days of Vendor Relationship Management (VRM) thinking. It remains the most elegant articulation of the asymmetry weâre working to address.
Credit to John Caswell for this formulation. It captures something Iâve observed across two decades of watching software companies excel at doing just that.
I should write a newsletter one day explaining âwhyâ PHIâPIN.
Bustin' Out
Most organisations are optimised for a world that no longer exists - built for control and standardisation and competing in one that demands responsiveness and fluidity. You canât patch engagement onto record; the invisible architecture has to shift, and that requires the same structured thinking that got you here, just pointed differently. I published 8 new pages about this over the weekend - but what follows is a more playful approach to the framework.
I Can See Clearly Now
Can you? You have strategy documents, cultural initiatives, leadership programs, performance metrics ⌠you name it ⌠all the pieces from different jigsaws and no picture to even help you understand that you are on a hiding to nothing.
The Business Equation is running - because it always is. You are transforming core resources through process and technology, guided by human intent, into something others recognise as value. Just like every other organisation on the planet.
Are you tuning it or fighting itâ
The Times They Are A-Changinâ
Dylan nailed it decades ago, but still we cling to âSystems of Recordâ built for âThe Age of Reasonâ.
Optimized for efficiency, control, predictability. They work brilliantly if the world stays still. It doesnât. âCustomer Effective Demand Networksâ have beaten out âProducer Efficient Supply Chainsâ. Your customers expect âEngagementâ, not âTransactionsâ. Your staff expect âAgency, not âInstructionâ.
The answerââSystems of Engagementâ
Most organisations intuitively feel this - but perhaps canât articulate it - and what the hell is a âsystem of engagementâ anyway. So we know it. Feel it even. But we can't move toward it because the foundations are built wrong.
So where do we actually startâ
Itâs About the Journey
The sequence determines everything. People First - then Process - then Technology. That adage has been in play for decades, and still we don't understand that it's not just the words. It's the order.
Look around and watch organisations implement technology expecting people to adapt. Trying to change culture and expecting strategy to follow. Build and rebuild structure thinking that the work will fit.
Itâs all backwards.
Structured Thought is not a methodology you implement. It's a practice. A way of bringing coherence to complexity by understanding which layer is actually broken.
Get the sequence right and each layer amplifies the next. Get it wrong and youâre fighting yourself while pretending youâre progressing.
Your task determines what structure you actually need, the structure enables your people to think and respond and those people enable you to use technology as a tool, not as a cage.
What happens when you get it rightâ
The Space Between
If music is the space between the notes - work is the space between the boxes and when the sequence is right, something shifts. Not because you added more tools. Because you stopped letting them drift.
Your work becomes clear. People understand what problem theyâre solving. They can see how their effort connects. They have agency to make decisions without asking permission.
Systems of Engagement start working because theyâre built on a foundation that actually exists.
Data starts to be led by people, not leading people. You measure what signals matter. You stop optimising for transaction volume and start optimising for engagement quality.
When people have clarity and agency, they make better decisions faster.
Can you feel it happeningâ
Comfortably Numb
We know somethingâs wrong. We feel it. But weâre comfortable in the numbness.
So we double down on what we know. More frameworks. More meetings. More measurement. We add layers instead of asking which layer is actually broken.
Why do we keep doing thisâ
Message In A Bottle
The message is there. Itâs been there the whole time, but what you read depends on where youâre standing.
To operations: Your processes are fighting how work actually happens.
To strategy: Your strategy isnât landing because people canât see it.
To culture: Your initiatives are disconnected from the actual work.
To technology: Your tools sit unused because the foundation isnât built.
Same organisation. Same broken architecture. Different message.
People intuitively feel this. But there's no structure to build agreement on what it means. So they pull the bottle in different directions and the message gets ignored.
Operations wants to fix process.
Strategy wants to fix communication.
Culture wants to fix engagement.
Technology wants to fix adoption.
All diagnosing the same patient. All treating different symptoms. Nobody examining the root cause. But, once you see it, the message becomes clear. Not different messages from different angles. One message, finally legible to everyone. Thatâs when things change.
What happens nextâ
People
Your data is led. Your people are first. Not as a slogan. Actually first.
You stop optimizing every system for measurement and control. You start optimizing for clarity and agency.
You invest in understanding your actual task. Then you give people the tools, context, and trust to solve it.
You sense what customers actually need. You let your people think instead of follow.
When you run the Business Equation this way - with clarity at the foundation, structure enabling people, and people enabling technology - the equation stops being something you manage and becomes something that reinforces itself.
But will you let itâ
Where Are We Now
The gap is real. Systems of Record built for yesterday. Systems of Engagement demanded by today. The collision is happening.
But hereâs the thing about the message in the bottle. You can read the words, understand them, feel the weight of them. And still choose not to act. Living in your numbness.
Most organisations have already pulled the bottle from the water. Theyâve read the message. They know the sequence matters. They know which layer is broken.
And yet.
The question isnât whether you understand the problem anymore. Itâs whether youâre willing to stop everything else to fix it.
Because this takes focus. This takes choice. This takes you - actually present, making actual decisions, staying integrated across functions instead of delegating it all away.
Are you readyâ
My Way
Music is my core and finds its way into everything. Meanwhile, I've published a series of pages on the main site walking through these challenges in detail.
This newsletter tells that story differently - through the lens of music and to remind us all that there is no single way. No absolute.
Paul Anka writes the song. Frank makes it famous. Sid turns it upside down.
Thatâs the point of the music I chose. Famous songs and unknowns. Covers and originals. Sometimes the covers are better than the original because they contain messages you donât feel until someone else plays them. One of those videos shows us that everyone has a voice. No matter how insignifcant you might feel - the fact is that anyone can change the future. (Spoiler alert - itâs the Dave Mathews song.)
And then thereâs the mix. Because if you do it exactly the same, whatâs the point?
Life is a mix. Itâs always different. Transformation is just the same.
Your organisation right now is a cover of something that used to work. A remix of systems built for yesterday, trying to make them sing in a world thatâs moved on.
Those pages on the web site arenât instructions. Theyâre the score.
What you do with them, how you play them, who you bring into the performance, which notes you emphasise, thatâs your remix. Thatâs where the real work happens.
If you reached this far and want to talk more - I certainly do.
Letâs set up some time to explore how Structured Thought can be used to help your business transition into the âAge of Experienceâ.
Bonus: who played the song that inspired the title of this newsletterâ
Iâll tell youâď¸
Coherence Is The New Moat
Not yet subscribed? Thereâs a button for that.

And then it happened
Ooh, and then it happened
Ooh, and then it happened
Ooh, and then it happenedđŹ Holland Dozier and Holland (âH-D-Hâ to their friends.)
If you have been following along (and if not - why not?) since the early days of People First, my work in Structured Thought and more recently, the consolidation into PHIâPIN then this is for you.
If you havenât - it is - maybe even more so - still - for you.
Finally. It happened. Sometimes you think that you might just be âđđľ blowing in the windâ - until one day it changes and you think âmaybe notâ.
Today is one such day - because whilst spinning through this morningâs âthought reviewâ - 6 articles caught my eye1 that all connected. With each other, with me and with Structured Thought.
Six Voices. One Message.
Paolo Valdemarin | Laid out the job of what I call an âEngagement Platformâ by externalising your operating model so AI can translate between contexts while maintaining a single understanding.
Ben Thompson | Microsoft chose âcoherence over scaleâ by prioritising its own product suite. Why? Because maintaining a coherent vision across a portfolio matters more than maximising any single dimension.
Joan Westenberg | Solo operators using Structured Thought beat out large organisations because coherence compounds while incoherence fragments.
Christopher Lochhead | Execution is automated, knowledge is commoditised and real value has moved âupstreamâ to problem framing. Which is exactly the point of âavoiding solving the wrong problem really wellâ as my friend John Caswell has it and indeed, provides a âwhyâ of Structured Thought.
Geoffrey Moore | Agentic AI needs to be deployed atop proven, reliable structures with guardrails built in, not improvised on the fly.
Om Malik | The âannouncement economyâ is a world of velocity and noise. Coherence matters precisely because everything else is optimised for attention rather than truth. I called it the ânoise economyâ when I wrote about this last September in a piece called âSound of Silenceâ.
The Convergence
You might think that these are isolated observations. They are not. Nor are they unique (other than they all appeared in my feed this morning). Bottom line - they are all describing the same shift. A shift that is unspoken - but at the heart of Structured Thought.
Competitive advantage is no longer scale, speed, or even access to AI. Itâs coherence - the degree to which every decision, every output, every interaction derives from the same underlying model of reality.
In large organisations, this is nearly impossible. Different departments operate from different mental models and information fragments at every handoff. AI amplifies the disagreement rather than resolving it. But a small team with explicit structure working with a clear operating model, documented constraints, decision rationale, voice guidelines can scale without fragmenting and AI becomes a tool for executing within that coherence, not a way to hope disparate teams accidentally align. This is what structured thought actually means in practice: externalising your logic so thoroughly that it can guide people, process and systems.
Paolo Valdemarin: đ AI as a communication tool
Ben Thompson: đ Microsoft and Software Survival
Joan Westenberg : đ The Coherence Premium
Om Malik : đ The Announcement Economy
Chris Lockhead: đ The Value of Your Value (LinkedIN)
Geoffrey Moore : đ When will Agentic AI Cross The Chasm (LinkedIN)
Org Charts: Why They Are Wrong
Let me count the ways - but for now a short primer ….
Wrong - In What They Are
-
A static snapshot in a dynamic system - Org charts freeze people in place, in a world that’s fluid, adaptive, and always in motion.
-
An illusion of control - They suggest neat lines of authority, when actual influence flows in networks, whispers, and Slack threads.
-
A power fantasy - Designed more to reassure executives than to reflect how things really work on the ground.
Wrong - In How They Are
-
Too hierarchical, too linear - Most charts resemble military command structures in an age that demands collaboration and cross-functionality.
-
Built top-down, not inside-out - They reflect formal reporting lines, not value creation, lived relationships, or trust pathways.
-
Exclusionary by design - Contractors, advisors, ecosystem partners, AI tools? Nowhere to be seen, yet often critical to delivery.
Wrong - In the Information They Contain
-
Titles â capability - Job labels are vague proxies. They reveal little about what someone is great at, trusted for, or actually doing.
-
Missing the real flows - No view of how decisions are made, who connects teams, or where knowledge is hoarded vs. shared.
-
Performance blind - They say nothing about value contribution, outcomes, energy, or momentum.
Wrong - In How Work Is Understood
-
They reduce people to boxes - And forget that work is a web of conversations, motivations, tensions, experiments, and progress.
-
Ignore emergence and adaptability - Real work happens across silos, shaped by informal leaders, not always those in bold font.
-
Reinforce outdated logic - Built for predictability and scale, when today’s work is about learning, iterating, and adjusting on the fly.
The Fractalisation of Work
To understand how the fractalisation of work (doesnât) work - consider ‘the taxi’, the definition of which is in the process of being redefined as a personalised vehicle that will take you for a to b.
That continues - BUT ⌠it also used to be a place for …
-
Human conversation - spontaneously - about local gossip, life advice, or even silence. And all without algorithmsmonitoring sentiment.
-
A helping hand, someone who’d load your luggage, not because it was required, but because that’s what people do.
-
Navigation expertise by someone who knows the backstreets better than GPS, and magically avoid traffic lines.
-
The ‘welcome committee’, offering recommendations for where to eat, what to avoid, and how to make the most of your stay.
-
An interpreter or cultural guide, especially in unfamiliar cities or countries, bridging gaps in language and local norms.
-
A protector that waited until you got safely inside your home or hotel before driving off.
-
A confidant that listens to everything from your job woes to relationship breakdowns .. no subscription required.
-
A fixture of community memory in the form of a driver who knew your parents, remembered your last trip and asked after your kids.
-
A micro-economy participant, in that they often owned their vehicle, had real agency over hours, routes, pricing, and long-term plans and what they earned was part of the local economy where they plied their trade - no profits siphon off and extracted to the banks of the ride share company.
-
A professional, who knows that the job isn’t just driving, but care, awareness, and service - all wrapped in experience.
None of which is really provided by the things replacing taxis …
And yes - I know that doesnât describe all Taxis - but it certainly describes the good ones.
For the last 15 years, many companies chased âdigital transformation.â But if weâre honest, most of us didnât transform, we digitised. We took analog processes and made them digital. We moved pieces to the cloud. We modernised within silos. We upgraded the present - instead of redesigning the future for a digital-first world.
đŹ Brian Solis
** I have a draft that I clearly need to finish that is exactly along this theme although I call it a ‘**data-lead people first world’.
About This Blog
What is this blog about? Apparently it serves as a reflective exploration of complexity in various systems, highlighting the disconnect between theoretical frameworks and real-world behavior, while aiming to promote thoughtful navigation through that complexity. Who knew? Click through to read the why, the method and the overview.
Four Tools I Use
When I tell others, they seem to find them useful.
Ikigai - look it up
Pay, Play, Passion and Purpose - a ‘Structured Thought’ Model
Collect and Curate, Connect and Communicate - think Gladwell’s Tipping Point (Maven, Networker and Communicator).
Core and Context - think Moore - but then add a touch of Structured Thought with a dash of #PeopleFirst
đ … and then there is Hunter’s Letter
I’ll be back with more links at some point.
I was delighted to be joined on the People First podcast by Ramsey Avery who is the Production Designer for the Amazon series - Lord of the Rings - Rings of Power.
Wonderful conversation that I know you will enjoy.
đđď¸ Ramsey Avery - The Lord Of The Rings - The Rings Of Power
Discovered on my test blog from a year ago. (Clearly a space I don’t use a lot!)
âWe have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And weâre going to celebrate it,â Trump told Kristen Welker of âMeet the Press.â
.. no mention of people. Itâs as if some TechBro wrote his script. #PeopleFirst
The Peopleâs OS
Back in the archives of People First I used to talk about âThe Peopleâs OSâ. đ Here for example. It sat together with something that I also called HumanIT. In many ways playful ideas on a tech first world that even then was apparent - much less today. (Hat tip to my friend Jeff Orgel who gave me ‘HumanIT’.) (And now you know why I started ‘People First’.)
Reading this today makes me think that this movement might just be an idea whose time has finally come ⌠(another hat tip - this one to âVictorâ.)
My thanks to Jason for clarifying how this post that starts on Philpin.com gets to display on John.Philpin.com ⌠so I might need to append a content warning when I start up with the real posts.
Itâs a little bit odd, because back in The People First Days, I am sure the links went back to People First .. will take a closer look,.
It’s not just being different. It’s not only being the ‘only one that ‘does what you do’ (hat tip to ‘Jerry’). It’s not just following your dreams. It’s all of that - at the intersection of letting go of the ‘woulda coulda shoulda’ and wrapping that all up in a package that others value and give a shit about.
Part of an occasional series focused on the đ§ś thinking and methods. of đ§ś People First. Time will tell if it becomes something bigger like a book or ‘manual for survival’ (though that is the plan.)
Just joined a Discord and was asked to ‘introduce myself’. This is what I said …
I have lived at the intersection of âpeople empowerment through technology transformationâ for most of my career.
Problem - most of those people were INSIDE corporations and if you were on the outside - forget about it - you were a user, a âtargetâ and there was one objective ⌠âmaximize our share of your walletâ!
25 years ago a group of us asked if a Corporation can have a âCRMâ - why canât a Person have a VRM (Vendor Relationship Manager) .. the question remains unanswered and definitely not implemented.
About ten years ago, I started focussed writing and podcasting about âPeople Firstâ and been doing it ever since.
I have this feeling that Task driven Agent AIs might be the first opportunity to start solving these very real problems.
Finally - I am NOT a coder - fascinated by it - but I know my skills.
My job is to understand what is being produced and explain it to others in terms that THEY can understand and unpack the relevance.
Category Culls and Categorization
If you have been keeping track - you have havenât you? ⌠You will know that I am around about a year into a ‘category culling’ on my site. Iâm there. Except I am not.
As of 5 minutes ago - the last category died - number 5 below.

The objective was always to reduce the number to something more manageable. Believe it or not - this lot is around a 1/3 to 1/2 of what it used to be.
But am I really there? Could I go further? .. and really, it has to be recognized that this is mainly for me.
The Key
1 - The post a day category for 2024 (flagged because it is in a straight of reorganizational flux).
2 - Experimental category o next couple of weeks it will either be dead or committed.
3 - 15 years ago I had a site of jokes which got imported as part of my web site consolidation program. Seperately I do flag humorous things. I should merge the two.
4 - It was never an âInstagram importâ - 18 images that came from Insta - shouldnât they just be âphotosâ.
5 - Gone.
6 - I want to move all âtitled-postsâ to âlong formâ - if indeed they are long form - a long arduous (who cares) job.
7 - my’xxxx' was a way to keep the categories organized for past year as I organized - do I still need the âmyâ.
8 - hangover from the People First site - they donât need a category - so long as I can search and pull them up - thinking.
9 - people first is the preferred - so need to move peoplefirst across.
10 - do I need quote and quote wise? Quote is a quote - quote wise are the images that Readwise can deliver.
11 - another WIP - that will eventually become the âtop 10 of each category.
đ124/366 In The UNdaunted Collective I put up a new action group called ‘The Intersection’. I will explain more, I think some of you might be interested in joining.
Job 1 : A concise summary of what and why it is.
Job 2 : Share with you all - to see if my gut is right.
Job 0 : Launch đ The UNdaunted!














