Anyone else worried that this is even a question? Or that it needs to be asked?

Anyway, I don’t have an answer about lemon origins except to say that they are at least as real as babies, and if they aren’t real then what the fuck did I just eat?

šŸ’¬ The Bloggess

To be clear, this is not a Bloggess origin story … but rather a debate that seems to have emerged on the inter-webs somewhere about ā€˜Intelligence versus Artificial Intelligence’ - with people pointing out that Lemons ā€˜do not occur naturally’ … so are artificial … so not ā€˜real’ … at least in ā€˜that’ sense of the word.

First, if that is true, then total news to me. But put that aside, because the quirkiness of the debate tickles me. It’s ā€˜the other thing’ that has slipped quietly under the radar, that I am worrying about, because at some point in the online world, ā€˜real’ has become synonymous with ā€˜exist’.

That is … if it is not real - then it does not exist.

Really?

Now, I am not a philosopher - so the existence of a lemon I leave to people further up the pay grade scale than I, but I did get to wondering whether this is a ā€˜Cunkstion’1, or at least Cunk like?

Can someone higher up the pay scale have a think and reply please?

Read More From The Bloggess: šŸ”— When life may or may not give you lemons


  1. Cunkstion - a contraction of ā€˜Cunk Question’ - which is one of those innocent, easy ā€˜obvious’ questions that nobody has ever asked - but when you do - the expert finds themselves tied up in knots for one of three reasons …1) it is just plain stupid, 2 a non sequitur or 3) a deeply profound question demonstrating great insight (if on occasions - accidentally). ↩︎