I don’t think the Beatles were the greatest band that ever lived. There I said it. I know there will be people that disagree with me.
That said, even with two views of ‘truth’ it is still possible to have a deep, interesting, meaningful conversation that might open my mind and who knows … ‘theirs’ as well. In other words in this case true connection is possible even if the participants have different ‘realities’.
BUT - and it is a big but .. that does require a willingness on both sides to bridge those differences through empathy, listening, open-mindedness and communication. It is that very act of seeking to understand others - and in turn be understood - that creates a space where connection thrives.
I think loneliness emerges from the inability to connect.
It remains possible in music, literature and sport to name but three random topics of conversation in the public square (the real public square - not the dumpster fire), so why not in politics? I have an idea.
I think true connection can be fostered when individuals prioritize mutual respect and shared humanity over complete agreement or identical perceptions.
Sadly, when it comes to politics the broad swathe of humanity are being trained by a few ‘bad actors’ (let’s keep it civil) to ignore that.
When did that start? Well, we all have ideas I am sure. Here’s mine …
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.
💬 George Bush
.. but he wasn’t the first.
Anyone who isn’t with me opposes me, and anyone who isn’t working with me is actually working against me.
💬 Matthew 12:30
Lenin and Mussolini also used similar phrasing to get their point across. This is a ‘both sides’ argument that has been effectively used over a couple of millennium to get the support of the masses.
When will they ever learn.
💬 Pete Seger
Never?
I am not sure how to fix it.
We’ve gone deep down the rabbit hole. It’s going to get worse. A lot worse. Before it gets better.