🔗 Scorsese Takes Aim at Streaming’s Lack of Curation … and more … including ‘content’

the art of cinema is being systematically devalued, sidelined, demeaned, and reduced to its lowest common denominator” by conceptualization of films as “content.

🖇️ 🔍 You might recall - the ‘content thing’ has been a drum beat of mine for a while now.

As always delighted to find more people jumping on the bus … or is it a train now?




To be real clear - I am NOT an Airline Analyst. I haven’t even played one on TV. But I do tend to look around and question claims that seem spurious. (And in my time down in New Zealand, I do hear a large number of claims made that do not seem to add up).

🖇️ My take on Chris Luxon. If you don’t know the name, that’s because he’s no Jacinda Arden .. though he holds her office in Aotearoa

(I wrote this in response to a newsletter on Substack suggesting that despite being one of those CEO types, he’s not doing a great job as PM. My point is that despite the press, I’m not sure he was what good as a CEO!)

(Another old post that didn’t make it into the ether until now)


🔗 Om on content, it’s as if I wrote it - not with the natural flow of Om - but definitely 🖇️🔎 the subject matter.



It All Makes Sense - until it doesn't. We are passed that point.

A few of today’s reads all came together this morning …

First up (which I am not even going to bother linking to) lead with something like … “how corporations can create emotional connections to their customers at ‘scale’.”

What the fucking what - do not even get me started. Do these people even think about what their words mean when they spew them out?

Anyway - onwards - and as so often happens Hugh over at Gaping Void says it the best …

🖇️ My highlights on the companion article

Meanwhile …

(Talking of ‘creating emotional connections at scale - one of those silent companies that you know the name of - but wonder what they do is Palantir (remember Cambridge Analytics - who paid the price?) .. yeah, Palantir was the ‘power behind the throne’ - who not only avoided paying the price - but have gone on from strength to strength.

Anyway, 🔗 over in Dana land .. he’s looking at the next 4 years - and pointing a very large finger at one 🖇️ Peter Thiel … you know the guy that really runs Palantir (all due respect to Karp), but to remind you who he really is …

The New Zealand Herald did quite a job on that topic - do take a read - eye opening - even if you think you know all about him. (Pro tip - if you have ‘reader mode’ - use it if you really want to read it.) .. and at the end…

According to building consent records, his Queenstown Plasma Screen holiday home last year suffered a serious fire, causing more than $500,000 in damage. Building consents for the repairs filed with the Queenstown Lakes District Council in May show Thiel took this opportunity to rebuild and repurpose a walk-in closet. Plans now describe this nook as a panic room.

.. a panic room. In Queenstown? .. and this is the guy who is quietly influencing the US Govt?

And then there is ‘Ted’s Take’ on the changing nature of communication.

🔗The related article

Are we doomed?

I guess not until this happens …

(The New Yorker)


“So are Sapiens and Neanderthals the same species or different species? And is “species” an objective reality that biologists discover, or is it an intersubjective reality that biologists impose?”

💬 Yuval Noah Harari

🔗🖇️ Coincidentally, have been exploring this idea as applied to Mathematics.


Over on Substack I published 🔗🖇️ this

At first blush, it might seem to be about maths and it certainly connects, but it’s really about those who challenge the status quo, see something different, push boundaries, which, not coincidentally is exactly what great startups do.

Love to know what you all think?


🔗🔎 BusinessBytes | 🔗 More


🖇️🔎 The Business Equation involves a number of dimensions starting with ‘The Quadrants’ - the top quadrant is market facing, bottom is organisation facing.

The Organisation Facing quadrant is supported by ‘Systems of Record’ - increasingly transitioning to ’Systems of Compliance

The Market Facing quadrant is supported by ‘Systems of Engagement’.

Businesses spend an inordinate amount of time focussed on ‘systems of compliance’ - to the detriment of ‘systems of engagement’.

Despite Business Growth emerging from ‘Systems of Engagement’.


🔗🔎 BusinessBytes | 🔗 More


🔗 🎙️You Must Answer The Questions About Feet

I might have posted this link before, but I keep sending it to people. It ties back to 🖇️🎙️my own podcast about Agents - nearly two years ago now. Still an issue - and will be for a long time yet.


🔗🔎 BusinessBytes | 🔗 More


🎵🖇️ 18 - 1975 - Pete Wingfield.

🎵🔗 19 - 1996 - Another Great (though very different) Track - this one from Paul Hardcastle.

Sometimes time goes slow.


Searching my site for something totally different and it found 🖇️ this joke post - one of those things that used to circulate the wires. It is seventeen years old. It’s funny - though the names are definitely from a moment in history. The fourth one down caught my eye …

MOHAMMED SAEED AL-SAHAF (COMICAL ALI):
The chicken did not cross the road. This is a complete fabrication. We do not even have a chicken.

Comical Ali (Ali G) is of course the Sacha Baron Cohen creation from before Borat …

Fake News in a comedian’s kitbag 17 years ago.

This shit has been going on for too long.


🖇️ The Coming Labor War - Dana F. Blankenhorn

.. yup. If I have posted this before. Sorry. But it does bear repeating.


Spatial Computing Has Another Contender - AND - They Are Not Called Meta.

Stumbled across this a week or so ago and it got me to thinking - remember the 🖇️ Vision Pro?

Still don’t have one - no plan to - no personal use case (desire is apparently not a use case … who knew?)

That said, there are bundles and bundles of Business Use cases.

Anyway, turns out that 🔗 Sightful are coming out with a solution to a specific use case early 2025.

Their glasses predates Zuck’s and I would argue stand to be adopted more because they are going to be focussed on what looks like a single use case … virtual screens in confined spaces.

Yes folks - Spatial Computing for the rest of us (though to be fair - no pricing that I can see - so may still be only for the wealthy.)


Revenge Of The Nerds - Real Revenge

Back a few years ago - I raised the idea that 🖇️ ATS systems should just be banned.. Nothing changed.

Then I found this clip from The Monkees TV show that aired in the late 60s … 🖇️ The Monkees Predicting ATS software THIRTY YEARS before it appeared. Yes - 30 years is right - that’s when these things started to appear.

Of course in the intermediate time - they have just got better worse.

Even to the point of AI🖇️ Avatars Doing Job Interviews

You cannot make this stuff up!

A lot of my objections about so much of this tech is that it;

  • ends up in corporate hands
  • is misused
  • is badly misused
  • is extremely and badly abused

… and all the time never does anyone build a similar system for people. AND corporates don’t end up recruiting the best people for reasons like;

  • the best people ‘don’t have time for that’
  • the best people want to work with the best people - not bots
  • the best people don’t tune their resumes to be Keyword and SEO compliant - necessary if you stand any chance of an ATS letting you through its gates

Until now. Brilliant …. The new story is from 404 Media. I haven’t checked but - does this tickle your fancy? It does mine …

🔗 ‘I Applied to 2,843 Roles’

The solution is sitting in Github - 🔗The solution is sitting in github so I am not qualified to comment on how well this works - but I have friends.

Of course corporate HR is going to declare ‘no fair’ because their systems are going to be swamped … too bad.

I presume that someone is going to fork the code and use it to apply for contracts .. and it wont be long before their AIs contact someone on Amazon Turk and convince them to register and sign on (on their behalf) for Job Boards and Recruiter sites - so we can do the same thing there. (Of course it won’t be long before the AIs can also do that.)

We know that the retaliation is going to happen - example case - someone inside the company uses their brains and writes code to get their 5 day job done in 2 to 4 hours - and then take a second job - repeat - and a third job - repeat … what do you think the corporate does when they find out? Promote them?

My prediction - they will work out how to block this access.

Let the battle begin.


More on Kris

I ’never’ do this - so take this as the exception that proves the rule. We all know that 🖇️ Kris K recently passed - on Maui

My friend Randall wrote to me (these extracts reproduced with his permission)

Such a sad loss of a hero whom I actually knew …. Sarah Teed and I had the privilege of a hanging w/ him and John Prine when we played the Castle theater many years ago and I opened for him at the MACC many times sharing moments with him and his wife Lisa.

Randall went on and shared some Kris wisdom …

”He believed that songwriting is a spiritual communion of mind, body, and soul, and he believed that William Blake was correct in asserting that anyone divinely ordered for spiritual communion but buries his talent will be pursued by sorrow and desperation through life and by shame and confusion for eternity.

” (Blake) is telling you that you’ll be miserable if you don’t do what you’re supposed to do," Kristofferson said in the Ken Burns' documentary ‘Country Music’.”


It’s only getting worse …

🔗 AI Avatars Are Doing Job Interviews Now

For the longest time I have argued against the thoughtless deployment of ATS systems in corporations.

Downside for corporates - totally miss the nuance of people and their ‘particular sets of skills’ because they are over simplifying what they think they are looking for.

Downside for people - your resume and cover letter are no longer enough - you know need to think about tuning yourself with keywords to ensure you are fully ‘Search Engine Optimised’.

The whole thing is just one giant mess that benefits nobody.

Me previously …


The Crafting of Craft.

🖇️ Talking about knowing what you’re talking about - nobody who knows what they are talking about would confuse me with a real programmer.

That said, I just read 🔗 Going the Extra Mile — Beyond CSS, most of which is well above my technical pay grade - but still I was fascinated by the attention to detail around ‘crafting Craft’.

Consider - a whole post (well 75%) devoted to the process behind getting a check box ‘just right’ and the remaining 25% explaining ‘push away’, which I knew had to be coded in some way - but who knew there is a phrase for it?

Great read - even if you aren’t technical you get the idea of their focus on good design - Steve would have been proud of them

“When you’re a carpenter making a beautiful chest of drawers, you’re not going to use a piece of plywood on the back, even though it faces the wall and nobody will ever see it. You’ll know it’s there, so you’re going to use a beautiful piece of wood on the back. For you to sleep well at night, the aesthetic, the quality, has to be carried all the way through.”

💬 Steve Jobs

… which probably explains why they won app of the year and were name called (not once - but twice) in this year’s WWDC.

The article ends with …

All of this for what? Will all users see the difference? — Probably not. Was it worth it? — Absolutely. These are the minor details that often go unnoticed when present, but become conspicuous when missing. We strive for having as many of those details as possible, making the experience great but at the same time — seamless.

Kudos to Craft - a Great App and a serious tool for writing documents in the 21st Century.

( 🖇️ Related (Page-less Writing Apps) )


Somebody googled me recently and emailed me asking if I was ‘the criminal profiler’, or at least connected to him.

I am, and back in 2017, I wrote a little post connecting the two of us.

I have just added the full story of when we ‘met’ a loooong time ago -and appended it to the 2017 post.

🖇️ You will find it here.

(The story started before Google.)

In 2024 if you Google “John Philpin”, you will indeed find that there are two of us, but back then, there wasn’t a Google … I know kids .. hard to believe. There was something called ‘Alta Vista’ and Yahoo - but nascent at best.