π Updated
πΈ A test as much as anything to see what Gemma 4 26B did with providing ‘accessibility text’ for my photo.
This is what it came up with:
A small structure with a dark roof covered in solar panels sits nestled among a dense backdrop of lush green trees.
Not too shabby. It was that kind of phrasing I had in my mind when I took it down by the beach last week, observing how the roof of an old boathouse (Unused? Do not know.) could double up as a baby solar ‘farm’ and not be that distracting.
Farm? Ok ‘backlot’.
π UPDATE: 5 Minutes Later
Now I have read π Manton’s post properly - point of clarification -
While the checkbox is present in the current build, the server-side work is not yet enabled for any users.
So jury remains out as to how good the local model will be. I will run a test on the same image when it is available … so marking this post π§
ποΈ Caveat - Not My Words ...
β¦ but there for the grace of whatever power you hold true - do we all go. Sometime sooner. Sometimes very much later. But go we do. Few have the power to control βwhenβ.
π₯ On The Waterfront β β β β
In a nutshell - if you havent seen it - watch it. If you have seen it - watch it again.
π₯ ABBA: The Movie, 1977 β β

Abba was never my bag, so why I went to see this in the Odeon (I think) cinema in Streatham, South London - I have no idea. It was fine - until it exploded into the closing credits. All this time later - I still remember the image and the music - a movie all by itself. Only two stars - but try to find the closing credits - sound up - on a big screen - dark room. Still π€―

π₯ F1, 2025 β β β β

I have no idea why it took us until last night to finally get round to watching. But get round to watching we did. I now have even less understanding as to why the delay.
If you still havenβt seen it β¦ rectify the situation ASAP.

π₯ Big Fish, 2003 β β β β β

When I first saw this film β¦ film, not movie - film β¦ I logged it as one of my top, personal favourites of all time.
My opinion hasnβt changed.

π₯ Nobody 2, 2025 β β

Not as good as Nobody - but then Nobody caught me out - where as Nobody 2 was - well ... Nobody 2. Colin Hanks looks so much like his Dad. Sharon Stone looked nothing like Sharon Stone - and yet was. The whole film was way better than any of Chevy's vacation movies - and the set up for the final action scene was lifted straight out of The A Team - and just as much fun.

π₯ Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man, 2026 β β

This is a film - not a show and so lacked .. a lot. It also requires the watching of the magnificent series that preceded it to really get it. So yes β¦ enjoyed, but if you havenβt seen the shows β¦ donβt bother and if you have, you will be disappointed.
.. and very glad I missed it in the Theaters.
The star rating might seem harsh - it seemed that way - even to me - but this is a good example of how a normalised rating system can help you - dear reader - get better clarity on the 'why'. To cut to the chase - I did enjoy it - any film that sits with 2 or more stars in here are worth watches - but at this level - a lot of caveats.

π₯ The Courier, 2020 β β β

Yeah .. No.Β
BC did a really good job - including the transformation - but so slow β¦Β
And if you know me and historical dramas .. doubling down on the βyeah .. noβ

πΊ Prime Target β β β

Had this been on Netflix I might have rated it higher. But it wasnβt. Worth a watch for sure .. but not before all the other crackers on Apple TV. And Prime Numbers? I wonder if this was green lighted by the person who did the same for Three Body Problem over on Netflix? Both strike me as written because they came up with a cool maths title - and then asked - so whats the story?
Donβt get me wrong, this was way better than Three Body Problem (which I still need to review) - but I still felt unsatisfied.
Prime Target on π Reelgood

π₯ The Instigators, 2024 β β

Average score for an average movie. Casey? Never been overly bothered, but Matt is capable of so much more.

ποΈ A couple of revised posts on the blog.
ποΈποΈ Will Arnett doesnβt like the word content either.
ποΈποΈ Why my term ‘English Progressive’ might make sense in musical genres. {π§ BROKEN - SORRY}
Opening up a new category on the blog that I call ‘ποΈ snippets’.
More refinement might yet occur.
πΊ Peaky Blinders β β β β β
The Series that is. The film at the end - to bring ‘closure’? Yeah - not so much
Creating a Loop Problem In Feedbin
- Find the RSS feed for βοΈ posts
- Add that feed to Feedbin
β-
Star any post .. it appears in the βοΈ posts
The new RSS feed now displays that βοΈ post
That βnewβ βοΈ post now appears in βοΈ posts
The new RSS feed now displays that βοΈ post
πππππππ
β-
π€¦ββοΈ Have now deleted the RSS feed!
If You Don't Add Value - Why Are You There?

It is telling that someone like Doug Rushkoff can write these words;
Only individuals who create value for the company are awarded new stock proportionate to their contributions.
π¬ Douglas Rushkoff
... without questioning the principle.
The corollary is of course that there are people that work inside a company that don't add value, which for yours truly is of course like a 'red rag to a bull' - because as the title of this post suggests, if you are employed by a company and not adding value to that company - then why are you there?
Stakeholder capitalism (apparently) 'solves' the problem.
βStakeholder capitalismβΒ is the buzzwordΒ du jourΒ for business practices that strive to achieve more than profits and a high stock price.
π¬ McKinsey
If you want to read more - you can:
Putting stakeholder capitalism into practice.
To be fair, the idea of 'Stakeholder Capitalism' has been around for several decades, although who actually coined the term is up for debate, with names including Klaus Schwab (Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum), Peter Drucker and Tom Peters.
Still wondering? This is not a bad primer.
So yes - it is not a new idea - it's just that as the world's conversation is moving into fairness and equality, as we see a (kind of) resurgence of Unions and as 'capitalists' are pushed into the corner of 'defending their position' ... the term is emerging and arguably being positioned as the logical next step for a 'sustainable economy'.
I wrote about this over three years ago when I shared a Ted Talk from Nick Hanauer. Today, that video has had over 5 million views. At the point of 'first discovery', I had not heard of Nick - but as I pointed out, the principles of what he was talking about are engrained in People First thinking.
Today, you can hear the same language when people talk about DAOs in the world of 'Web3' and quite a few other places.
But then many steps before 'Stakeholder Capitalism', there was something called 'The Cooperative Movement' which got its start in 1844 in Rochdale a small town in Lancashire, England.
So far, I have not read anything that clearly articulates the distinction between Stakeholder Capitalism and Cooperatives and which and why each might be better or worse than the other. Sometimes I wonder if 'cooperative' is too 'radical' in this world - so we keep inventing new words to describe the same thing.
I have always liked the New Values/Old Values - New Power/Old Power model originally developed by Jeremy Heimans and Henry Timms nearly ten years ago.
So, picking on a random target company like Uber, which despite hanging its hat on 'the sharing economy' is actually π― an 'old thinking' capitalist company.

Now consider a company called ATX Coop Taxi - a cooperative taxi service based in Austin that has been around for over 5 years. NO - they aren't as well known - but their service is a 'cooperative'.
The question is why hasnβt it taken off?
That is for another time.
